Level

Anthropic

Research Scientist/Engineer, Biological Safety

Anthropic is hiring a Research Scientist/Engineer, Biological Safety in San Francisco, United States. It pays $300k-$405k a year and Level rates it ; you can apply on Anthropic.

Level's read on this job

  • Builds AI ●●●● is how Level rates this research scientist role: the job is building AI systems.
  • The listed pay starts 57% above the typical research scientist posting on Level.
  • Anthropic mentions visa sponsorship in this posting.
  • Tools and skills the posting cites include fine tuning, AI evaluation and AI safety.
  • Level lists 680 other open roles at Anthropic.

AI in this role

fine-tuningai-evaluationai-safetyai-research

About Anthropic

Anthropic’s mission is to create reliable, interpretable, and steerable AI systems. We want AI to be safe and beneficial for our users and for society as a whole. Our team is a quickly growing group of committed researchers, engineers, policy experts, and business leaders working together to build beneficial AI systems.

About the role

We are looking for research engineers to build the safety and oversight mechanisms that govern how our models handle biological knowledge. As a bio safety researcher, you will spend your time: designing and running capability evaluations against frontier models, generating and curating training data for our safety classifiers, training and iterating on those classifiers alongside our ML engineers, and measuring how they hold up against adversarial pressure in production traffic.

This work sits at the intersection of applied ML and biosecurity. You will help define what responsible AI safety looks like in the biological domain, translating threat models into evals, datasets, and deployed systems. The core technical tension you will own is precision: safeguards need to be robust against sophisticated actors while staying out of the way of the far larger population of legitimate researchers using Claude to accelerate life sciences work. Getting that tradeoff right is an empirical problem, and you will be the person measuring it.

You do not need to be an ML researcher today. We are looking for strong scientific programmers with real depth in modern biology who want to bring that depth to bear on model evaluation and classifier development.

Key responsibilities

  • Design, build, and run capability evaluations to assess what new models can do in the biological domain, and turn results into concrete deployment recommendations
  • Develop training and evaluation datasets for our safety classifiers, working with internal and external threat modeling experts to ground them in realistic risk
  • Train, tune, and iterate on safety classifiers with ML engineers, optimizing jointly for adversarial robustness and low false-positive rates
  • Build the tooling and pipelines that make evaluation and classifier development fast and repeatable
  • Analyze classifier and eval performance against production traffic, identify gaps, and prioritize improvements
  • Design and run red-teaming and stress-testing of safeguards as threats, models, and product surfaces evolve
  • Partner with Research, Product, and Policy teams to embed biological safety throughout the model development lifecycle
  • Contribute to external communications including model cards, blog posts, and policy documents
  • Track developments in biology, ML, and biosecurity for their potential to create new risks or enable new mitigations

Minimum qualifications

  • Strong proficiency in Python, and extensive background in scientific programming and data analysis skills
  • Excellent grasp of ML fundamentals and an ability to rapidly adopt ML development practices
  • Excellent knowledge of modern biology across both measurement and engineering: high-throughput assays and functional characterization, as well as gene synthesis, genome editing, strain construction, and protein engineering
  • Ability to build and maintain your own tooling rather than relying on others to implement your ideas
  • Experience designing quantitative experiments or evaluations and drawing defensible conclusions from noisy results
  • Strong analytical and writing skills, and the ability to explain technical concepts to non-technical stakeholders
  • Familiarity with dual-use research concerns and biosecurity frameworks, such as select agent regulations, the Biological Weapons Convention, or Australia Group guidelines
  • Comfort with ambiguity and with shifting priorities as AI capabilities change
  • Can work independently while maintaining strong collaboration with cross-functional teams
  • Are results-oriented, with a bias towards flexibility and impact
  • Thrive in a fast-paced research environment where you balance rigorous scientific standards with rapid iteration

Preferred qualifications

  • Experience working with large language models, including prompting, fine-tuning, or evaluation
  • Experience training or deploying classifiers or other ML systems in production
  • Experience developing ML methods for biological systems or biological data
  • Familiarity with adversarial robustness, red-teaming, or safety evaluation of ML systems
  • Have at least 8 years of hands-on experience in life sciences, with deep expertise in areas such as molecular biology, drug discovery, or computational biology
  • Experience leading complex technical projects across multiple stakeholder groups

The annual compensation range for this role is listed below. 

For sales roles, the range provided is the role’s On Target Earnings ("OTE") range, meaning that the range includes both the sales commissions/sales bonuses target and annual base salary for the role.

Annual Salary:$300,000—$405,000 USD

Logistics

Minimum education: Bachelor’s degree or an equivalent combination of education, training, and/or experience

Required field of study: A field relevant to the role as demonstrated through coursework, training, or professional experience

Minimum years of experience: Years of experience required will correlate with the internal job level requirements for the position

Location-based hybrid policy: Currently, we expect all staff to be in one of our offices at least 25% of the time. However, some roles may require more time in our offices.

Visa sponsorship: We do sponsor visas! However, we aren't able to successfully sponsor visas for every role and every candidate. But if we make you an offer, we will make every reasonable effort to get you a visa, and we retain an immigration lawyer to help with this.

We encourage you to apply even if you do not believe you meet every single qualification. Not all strong candidates will meet every single qualification as listed.  Research shows that people who identify as being from underrepresented groups are more prone to experiencing imposter syndrome and doubting the strength of their candidacy, so we urge you not to exclude yourself prematurely and to submit an application if you're interested in this work. We think AI systems like the ones we're building have enormous social and ethical implications. We think this makes representation even more important, and we strive to include a range of diverse perspectives on our team.

Your safety matters to us. To protect yourself from potential scams, remember that Anthropic recruiters only contact you from @anthropic.com email addresses. In some cases, we may partner with vetted recruiting agencies who will identify themselves as working on behalf of Anthropic. Be cautious of emails from other domains. Legitimate Anthropic recruiters will never ask for money, fees, or banking information before your first day. If you're ever unsure about a communication, don't click any links—visit anthropic.com/careers directly for confirmed position openings.

How we're different

We believe that the highest-impact AI research will be big science. At Anthropic we work as a single cohesive team on just a few large-scale research efforts. And we value impact — advancing our long-term goals of steerable, trustworthy AI — rather than work on smaller and more specific puzzles. We view AI research as an empirical science, which has as much in common with physics and biology as with traditional efforts in computer science. We're an extremely collaborative group, and we host frequent research discussions to ensure that we are pursuing the highest-impact work at any given time. As such, we greatly value communication skills.

The easiest way to understand our research directions is to read our recent research. This research continues many of the directions our team worked on prior to Anthropic, including: GPT-3, Circuit-Based Interpretability, Multimodal Neurons, Scaling Laws, AI & Compute, Concrete Problems in AI Safety, and Learning from Human Preferences.

Come work with us!

Anthropic is a public benefit corporation headquartered in San Francisco. We offer competitive compensation and benefits, optional equity donation matching, generous vacation and parental leave, flexible working hours, and a lovely office space in which to collaborate with colleagues. Guidance on Candidates' AI Usage: Learn about our policy for using AI in our application process.

How we rate this

Research Scientist/Engineer, Biological Safety at Anthropic rates 95 out of 100 for how much of the daily work is AI. That makes it Builds AI (AI Level 4 of 4). The level is about AI in the job, not seniority.

Classification

Builds AI. The job is building AI systems.

  1. ●●●● Builds AI80 to 100
  2. ●●●○ Works on AI60 to 79
  3. ●●○○ Uses AI40 to 59
  4. ●○○○ Little AI0 to 39

Levels come from how often the tools, models and workflows of the role are named in the posting itself. Read the description and count the AI tools, models and workflows it names.

Prepare for this job

Built from this posting and from similar jobs on Level.

Skills and AI tools this role asks for

Fine-tuningAI EvaluationAI SafetyAI Research

Also common in research scientist jobs at this level

Pay

This job starts at
$300k
Typical research scientist job
$191k

This posting starts 57% above the typical research scientist job. See research scientist jobs

Questions you could be asked

  1. Walk me through fine-tuning a model: what data did you use, and how did you check the result?
  2. How do you decide that one model's output is better than another's for a given task?
  3. How do you think about the risk of an AI system in this kind of role failing silently?
  4. Tell me about a research question you investigated. What did you find?
  5. How would you decide a model or AI system is ready to ship?

Adapt your resume

  • List these exact terms on your resume: Fine-tuning, AI Evaluation, AI Safety, and AI Research. An applicant tracking system matches the wording, not the idea.
  • Attach one line of real, concrete experience to at least one of them. A tool named with nothing behind it rarely survives a human read.
  • Lead with what you built, trained or shipped. This role is judged on the AI system itself, not the tools around it.

Want an expert to read your CV for this job?

Free. Send your CV and the role you want next. We reply by email within 2 to 4 business days.

Get new research scientist jobs (Builds AI ●●●●) by email

One email a week with the new research scientist jobs (Builds AI ●●●●), each rated for how much AI is in the work. No recruiter spam, unsubscribe in one click.

Free. One email a week. Unsubscribe in one click.

Similar roles

Research roles that build AI, at other companies.

What kind of AI work fits you?

Answer 12 practical questions in about three minutes. Get a simple profile, the work it points to, and live roles to explore next.

Find my next step

More jobs at Anthropic

More research scientist jobs

Related searches

Same AI level

Jobs by city