AI Biologist - Structural Biology
LatchBio is hiring an AI Biologist - Structural Biology for a remote role open to applicants in United States. It pays $120k-$180k a year and Level rates it ; you can apply on LatchBio.
Level's read on this job
- On Level's scale, this role is Builds AI ●●●●: the job is building AI systems.
- The posting lists this role as remote.
- Tools and skills the posting cites include Claude, Cursor and AI agents.
- Level lists 22 other open roles at LatchBio.
- The role was posted in the last few days.
AI in this role
AI Biologist - Structural Biology
Latch builds rigorous scientific benchmarks (benchmarks.bio) for AI agents across biology. We work with frontier labs and pharma to measure whether agents can handle real biological workflows: the messy, multi-layer reasoning that matters in the field.
We're seeking an AI Biologist to join our Structural Biology team, pushing what AI can achieve in interpreting macromolecular structure.
About the Role. You will be the scientific authority on ground truth, testing whether agents can reason like an expert structural biologist. AI agents today read a deposited model as fact. They miss that a ligand sits in empty density, that the two chains in a crystal file are a packing contact rather than the biological dimer, that a confident AlphaFold prediction shows the wrong conformational state, or that a stretch of chain is built out of register. Separating what the data actually support from what the model asserts is the core of the job. Knowing where the evidence ends, and when a structure cannot support a claim, is part of the work.
The role is intentionally broad, spanning molecular systems, experimental and computational methods, and questions from structure determination to interaction analysis, molecular dynamics, and functional interpretation. You will work with software engineers and scientists to build benchmark tasks and datasets across viral and bacterial proteins, toxins, RNA elements, and host–pathogen complexes. Your judgment will set the standard for agent outputs across these areas, including:
Build the Task
Define what expert reasoning looks like for a structural question, and write gold-standard answers with the rationale an experienced crystallographer, cryo-EM scientist or biophysicist would defend.
Design realistic scenarios across the structural workflow: data collection and processing, map interpretation, model building, validation, assembly and state assignment, comparison, functional interpretation, protein–protein interaction analysis, molecular dynamics simulation, and metadynamics.
Curate datasets across modalities: X-ray structure factors and maps, cryo-EM maps and half-maps, atomic models, AlphaFold predictions with confidence metrics, molecular dynamics and metadynamics simulations and trajectories, NMR shifts and ensembles, SAXS curves, HDX-MS, cross-linking, and SHAPE/DMS reactivity.
Build analysis pipelines in Python (gemmi, Biopython/biotite, numpy) that compute verifiable ground truth directly from the files the agent receives.
Partner with software engineers to turn your judgment into new workflows.
Set the hard tasks
Test whether agents distinguish real structure from artifact or over-interpretation: unsupported ligands, register shifts, mirrored maps, crystal contacts read as interfaces, misdocked domains, and B-factors or occupancies treated as evidence.
Adjudicate ambiguous cases: decide what the map or measurement supports, where reasonable experts would disagree, and which additional data, such as a higher-resolution class, a solution-state measurement or a mutant, would settle the call.
Test whether agents choose the right representation and comparison for the question: the biological assembly versus the asymmetric unit, the right reference state, and which domain to superpose on.
Judge the agent
Interrogate agent reasoning step by step, and challenge conclusions that sound right but would not survive peer review or a validation report.
Pinpoint where agents go wrong: why a step fails, what an expert would do instead, and what evidence would change the call.
Score agent confidence, rewarding explicit uncertainty over overconfident calls on ambiguous structures.
Requirements
PhD in structural biology, biophysics, biochemistry, or a related field.
Hands-on structural experience: you have built and validated models yourself, and you know what a good and a bad map, model and fit look like.
Deep expertise in at least one area (X-ray crystallography, cryo-EM, NMR/solution methods, or computational structural biology) and working fluency across the others.
Coding for structural data: you can compute contacts, superpositions, symmetry mates, map values and geometry from files without a GUI.
AI-ready from day one: daily use of Claude, Cursor, or similar agents, with the judgment to spot where model reasoning is technically correct but scientifically unsound.
Confidence to overrule an AI agent when the evidence demands it, and the openness to update when shown wrong.
Ability to calibrate confidence and communicate uncertainty rather than defaulting to binary calls.
Bonus: structural virology or antibody–antigen structural work (viral glycoproteins, epitope mapping, structural interpretation of escape)
Bonus: RNA structural biology, protein–RNA interaction analysis
Culture. We practice radical transparency: you'll know how the company is doing, what's working, and what isn't. It'll always be us against the problem, never each other. We're opinionated but respectful, and we bring solutions with our problems. You decide how you work; we judge the output. We use AI constantly, so what we reward is original expert judgment, not AI output passed off as your own. You'll start on the bench that fits your expertise and can move across teams as you build a track record. People who do well here and bring leadership experience can move quickly into senior roles. Outside of work, we have company outings most months, team off-sites, a Latch run club, cycling, boxing, ice skating, and soccer. Feel free to add to the list.
Compensation & Logistics
Contract: 1099 (or W-8BEN internationally), no end date.
Pay: guaranteed for weeks 1-4 while you ramp, then paid per certified task. Most people in this position earn $120K–$180K+ (uncapped upside); certify twice the tasks/week, earn twice the pay that week.
Commitment: full-time, on your own schedule. Most of the team works 40+ hours a week.
Meetings: a few pod check-ins a week. The rest of your time is yours.
Location: remote (anywhere), hybrid, or onsite in SF. We prefer onsite.
Onsite perks: catered lunch and dinner daily, a waterfront office in Mission Bay, and monthly parking when available.
Work authorization: US citizens, permanent residents, and OPT holders. We can't support STEM OPT extensions or sponsorship.
Interview Process
We move fast: about 2–3 weeks from your first call, to offer.
Intro Screen - Latch Talent Team
Take-Home Project - HackerRank
Technical Interview - Member of Technical Staff
Culture Interview - C-Suite
Offer
How we rate this
AI Biologist - Structural Biology at LatchBio rates 84 out of 100 for how much of the daily work is AI. That makes it Builds AI (AI Level 4 of 4). The level is about AI in the job, not seniority.
Builds AI. The job is building AI systems.
- ●●●● Builds AI80 to 100
- ●●●○ Works on AI60 to 79
- ●●○○ Uses AI40 to 59
- ●○○○ Little AI0 to 39
Levels come from how often the tools, models and workflows of the role are named in the posting itself. Read the description and count the AI tools, models and workflows it names.
Prepare for this job
Built from this posting and from similar jobs on Level.
Skills and AI tools this role asks for
Questions you could be asked
- How do you decide when an AI agent can act on its own versus asking for approval first?
- Walk me through how you've used Claude in your day-to-day work.
- What are the limits of Cursor that you've run into, and how did you work around them?
- How would you decide a model or AI system is ready to ship?
- Tell me about a time a model underperformed in production. How did you find out, and what did you change?
Adapt your resume
- List these exact terms on your resume: AI agents, Claude, and Cursor. An applicant tracking system matches the wording, not the idea.
- Attach one line of real, concrete experience to at least one of them. A tool named with nothing behind it rarely survives a human read.
- Lead with what you built, trained or shipped. This role is judged on the AI system itself, not the tools around it.
Want an expert to read your CV for this job?
Free. Send your CV and the role you want next. We reply by email within 2 to 4 business days.
Get new remote AI jobs (Builds AI ●●●●) by email
One email a week with the new remote AI jobs (Builds AI ●●●●), each rated for how much AI is in the work. No recruiter spam, unsubscribe in one click.
Free. One email a week. Unsubscribe in one click.
Similar roles
Other roles that build AI, at other companies.
What kind of AI work fits you?
Answer 12 practical questions in about three minutes. Get a simple profile, the work it points to, and live roles to explore next.
Find my next step